DOCTOR"S see ARCHIVE JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA-"What are small boysmade of? Snips and snails, and puppy dogs" tails; That"s whatlittle boys are made of." follow to the old nursery rhyme.The next verse, of course, addresses the parallel question: "Whatare small girls make of? Sugar and spice, and also everything nice;That"s what tiny girls room made of." The behavioral differences in between boys and girlscontinue to it is in a matter of usual wisdom. Because that example, there wasa front-page post in The new York times on June 15 around thechildren of Robert F. ("Bobby") Kennedy. The reporterDeborah Sontag provided that, amongst Bobby"s 11 children: "Itwas welcomed that the guys had much more problems 보다 the girls, becauseas Mrs. Kennedy Townsend (the eldest the Bobby"s offspring) said,"boys in general acquire in problem more."" execute boys "get in problem more?" also morebasically, execute boys and also girls communicate in different behaviors? Ifso, why? Is it all learned with our experience (environmental)?Or, do our gene play a role, perhaps in pre-programming our behavior? What may be truly different in between boys" and girls"behaviors might not have to with boys" snips and snails and puppydogs" tails or with girls" sugar and spice levels. Instead, itmay have to do through differences between their X chromosomes. The is what is proposed in a provocative study publishedthis mainly in the eminent British newspaper Nature(1997;volume 387, web page 705). The record is licensed has been granted "Evidencefrom Turner"s syndrome of one imprinted X-linked locus affectingcognitive function." guys (XY) always receive their single X chromosomefrom their mother while girl (XX) receive an X from their motherand an X from your father. As much as X chromosomes go, what separatesboys from girls is not just that girls have two X chromosomesbut that just girls have an X chromosome from their father (apaternal X). Turner"s syndrome is a disorder the girls. Girls withTurner"s syndrome have only one intact X chromosome instead ofthe 2 Xs that common girls have. There is generally no secondsex chromosome in Turner girls. The "X-linked locus"mentioned in the report"s title refers to a position (the locus)of a gene ~ above the X chromosome. The Nature study says that thisarea that the X chromosome deserve to be "imprinted" (chemicallyaltered), so the the duty of the gene is various dependingon whether that X chromosome came from the father or the mother.In turn, this imprintable gene locus may have some influence on"cognitive function." Cognition (from the Latin cognitiomeaning "to know") is the procedure of the psychic by whichwe know, perceive, and think. In Turner"s syndrome it is sometimes said (for example,by the authors of the Nature study) the intelligenceis typically normal. In fact, the median IQ score of patient withTurner"s syndrome is around 90, i m sorry is clearly below the averageIQ that 100 in the general population.

You are watching: What are little boys made of

What is perhaps more striking around the capability tothink in patients v Turner"s syndrome is the specificity ofcertain neuropsychological defects. Turner"s girls often tend to havedeficits in visual-spatial orientation (so they have trouble driving),deficits in social believed (so they may miss ethereal social cues),and deficits in nonverbal difficulty solving (so castle may have problemswith mathematics concepts). Moreover, social adjustment problemsare rather commonplace in Turner"s girls. The examine in Nature exploited the factthat in the majority of girls v Turner"s syndrome, your singleintact X chromosome originates from their mom while in the remainingcases it comes from the father. The authors contrasted 55 Turner"sgirls who had actually a maternal X with 25 Turner"s girl who had actually a paternalX. They discovered that the Turner"s girls through a paternal X to be "significantlybetter adjusted with remarkable verbal and also higher-order executivefunction skills which mediate society interactions." many intriguing is how the authors of the research interprettheir results. They propose the imprinting that the paternal Xpermits activation and expression of one or an ext genes involvedin society skills. The X chromosome indigenous the dad is much more "socially inclined" than that from mom. (A genetically advanced viewer wrote us commenting that: "Imprinting is a term unlikely to be acquainted to the general population....Imprinted genes room not constantly expressed, imprinting can also repress a gene"s expression. In addition, the X chromosome is no imprinted! True, only one X is expressed in a regular female, but this is as result of X inactivation and also is random. This means that in two may inactivate the head X, the other the maternal X. Imprinting dictates the either the maternal or head gene (depending ~ above the gene involved) will always be expressed. In this case, the individuals debated only have actually one X - so expression is clearly not related to whether the chromosome is imprinted or not.) since all boys have an X chromosome that came fromtheir mothers, they can only get a Y chromosome the makesthem masculine from your fathers. Therefore, it adheres to that boyswill tend to lack the social savvy that girls. One deserve to speculate as to the evolutionary basis forthis disparity. Even without active genes for social skills, wouldmales in a hunter-gatherer culture have gone to a disadvantage?Did a man need social skills to follow down and kill a wild animal?On the other hand, gene determining social skills might it is in usefulto ladies working together around the campsite in a cooperativefashion, performing work such as cooking, do clothes, andraising children. The report in Nature is first-authoredby Dr. David H. Skuse indigenous the academy of Child health and wellness in London.Dr. Skuse is among ten writer of this study. The critical -listedauthor is Dr. Patricia A. Jacobs. (Together v the very first author,the last writer is traditionally taken into consideration most necessary tothe research). Dr. Jacobs is a senior chromosome scientist ofconsiderable renown.
SLIDESHOW love Disease: reasons of a Heart attack See Slideshow
The Pulitzer compensation winning reporter Natalie Angiernoted in The brand-new York times on June 12 that not all researchersare buying into this association in between a sex chromosome andbehavior. Because that instance, Dr. Evan S. Balaban the the NeurosciencesInstitute in mountain Diego pointed out to Ms. Angier that, "oneof the scientists on the existing report had actually been an author ona research in 1965" which linked "violent criminalbehavior" with XYY, one extra Y sex chromosome in males, anassociation the "proved to be statistically spurious."The scientist to who Dr. Balaban alluded is plainly Dr. Jacobs.However, because a 1965 study failed to hold up to follow-up researchis no reason at every why a 1997 study can not be appropriate on themark. Time will tell whether modern genetics has foundthe basis because that an old nursery rhyme.

See more: Can You Give A Hamster A Bath S? How To Give Your Hamster A Bath

For much more information, please visit the TURNER"S SYNDROME siteof