You are watching: Can you advance a fumble in college football
I think it"s one NFL rule. I"m not sure which method I choose it better. That seems favor jumping ~ above a ball rolling roughly in the finish zone must be a touchdown, but other time it seems like a cheapening the the touchdown. It enables luck to have actually a big play inthings.
The rule came around because that Dave Casper. The Raiders were losing with time expiring and he was about to be tackled quick of the goal heat so he fumbled the forward and the Raiders dropped on it in the finish zone and also won the game. Needless come say, it resulted in such an uproar that a new rule was added to the NFL.13NewYorkCard wrote:I think it"s one NFL rule. I"m not certain which method I prefer it better. It seems like jumping ~ above a ball rolling approximately in the finish zone must be a touchdown, but other times it seems favor a cheapening that the touchdown. It enables luck to have a large play in things.
It need to be the way, I recognize the fsu fumble wast top top purpose but the offense shouldn"t it is in able to advancement the ball on a fumble to keep human being from trying come fumble front on 4th downs or score line instances where they know they room short.I justwish all the rules to be the same nfl come NCAA consisting of the happen interference and so on (I get that best grammar police ;)
villian07 wrote: It must be the way, I understand the fsu fumble wast top top purpose however the offense shouldn"t be able to advancement the ball on a fumble to keep people from trying to fumble forward on fourth downs or score line instances where they know they space short.I just wish every the rules to be the very same nfl to NCAA including the happen interference and so on (I gain that ideal grammar police ;)I deserve to see that both ways. I have never yes, really thought about that being a strategy. (I guess because I am no a big NFL guy) however if you space down and virtually out of options... That is a great one. Friend tell your males that you space going to weak side. Overload that side and also fumble. As with the fumble the end of the endzone is a poor rule this one is too... And also not just because it has bitten united state in the target a couple of times
That ball was actually fumbled forward 3 times on the exact same play by Stabler, Banasscak and also Casper, and also all three admitted doing so intentionally.
cardinalfRED wrote: possibly I"m getting perplexed with an NFL rule, but I believed the offense can not development a fumble into the end zone because that a touchdown. If that"s not a rule, it should be. The dominance is it can not be advanced on fourth down, uneven by the human who fumbled. The preeminence is in place because fourth under is as soon as one would most likely purposely fumble in bespeak to try to advancement the ball. Friend aren"t as likely to do it purposely if you still have much more downs. For this reason it is quiet legal to advancement it.
That"s an NFL rule, ns was puzzled at an initial too. In university you can advancement a fumble... Just dumb luck and also I wish that rule would change. I hate that a team can benefit from a fumble walk forward and recovering it.
In the case of the FSU fumble one of our players actually punched the ball into the end zone with his forearm. Don"t understand if the would influence a call but it wasn"t technically fumbled forward until a defensive player punched the ball.
You seem to have actually missed the difference in between grammar police and also someone joking about with you. The "ect ect" comment was an effort at joking about with you. But because you asked in together a polite way, no girlfriend didn"t.13villian07 wrote: It must be the way, I understand the fsu fumble wast ~ above purpose but the offense shouldn"t it is in able to advance the round on a fumble to keep human being from trying come fumble forward on fourth downs or goal line situations where they recognize they are short.I simply wish every the rules to be the same nfl to NCAA including the pass interference ,etc (I get that appropriate grammar police ;)
I was young. I just remembered the final fumble by Casper about the end zone. Many thanks for the trip down storage lane.13RedSince60 wrote: That sphere was in reality fumbled forward 3 time on the very same play by Stabler, Banasscak and Casper, and also all 3 admitted doing so intentionally.
You room right. They did not intentionally fumble it forward but in order because that the NFL to be able to enforce the dominion no fumble have the right to be spotted more up the ar from the point that it occurred (I believe).13KyCardinal wrote: In the situation of the FSU fumble one of our players actually punched the ball right into the finish zone v his forearm. Don"t recognize if the would influence a call yet it wasn"t technically fumbled forward until a defensive player punched the ball.
See more: How Does Goku Lose His Tail, How Come Saiyan Tails Stopped Growing Back
esskaydoubleyoueareell wrote: You room right. They go not deliberately fumble that forward yet in order because that the NFL to have the ability to enforce the preeminence no fumble can be spotted more up the field from the suggest that it happened (I believe).Still only on fourth down. A fumble before that have the right to be progressed by anyone. Also the fumbling player, even on 4th down, can still advance the ball. I do not know off the peak of my head exactly how the college rule differs. Ns did find this on Wikipedia for whatever it is worth... In American soccer the violation cannot development the sphere if the recovers its very own fumble on 4th down, or in the last 2 minutes the the game, unless the round is recovered by the fumbler (there room no such restrictions in Canadian football). However, if the violation fumbles the ball, the defense recovers and then fumbles back to the offense, castle would acquire a very first down because possession had actually formally adjusted over the course of the play also though the ball had never been blown dead.